O is for open (as well as optimal, operable, optimistic, organic)

Authors

  • David Szanto
  • Alexia Moyer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v8i1.513

Keywords:

Open, Open Journal Systems, Academic Publishing, CFS/RCEA

Abstract

Much as we might like to think of the academy as an enlightened domain of pure knowledge creation, it is inextricably linked to financial and corporate influences. The business of academic publishing is a complex ecosystem of actors, processes, expectations, and perversions. Many of us have encountered—indeed, have reinforced—such entanglements. Very often our academic success depends on learning the rules of engagement and then following them. We research, we write, we publish; we review, we critique, we edit. We make our textual submissions and pay our subscription fees, whether directly to a journal or indirectly through our participation in the institutions, organizations, and libraries to which we are connected.

But this system, when we start to unpack it, can present some pretty nefarious effects. Research papers published in for-profit journals are not easily and freely accessible to those outside of institutional life. Yet these papers are generally produced by people with access to public funding, either from research councils or educational institutions. By paying for journal articles that sit behind paywalls, we are effectively transferring tax revenue into the pockets of private corporations. Of course, for those who can’t or don’t want to pay, there are semi- and non-legal options, but even ‘free’ access to PDFs comes with costs (often folded back into commercial publishers’ fee structures).

Downloads

Published

2021-04-22

How to Cite

Szanto, D., & Moyer, A. . (2021). O is for open (as well as optimal, operable, optimistic, organic). Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v8i1.513