Planning for food sovereignty in Canada? A comparative case study of two rural communities

Authors

  • Virginie Lavallée-Picard

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.73

Keywords:

food sovereignty, community food system, food system planning, food sovereignty planning, Canada, Québec, British Columbia

Abstract

In Canada, most local-governance level food system planning research has been conducted in larger, often urban communities. However, producers in small rural communities conduct the majority of Canada’s agricultural activities. Using case-study research, this paper documents how the rural communities of Saint-Camille (Québec) and Salt Spring Island (British Columbia) engage in food system planning. By investigating the background, key achievements, barriers and good practices, the case studies inform a comparative analysis of governance planning processes and community led project development. The results suggest an overlap between the community food system planning and the food sovereignty frameworks, a space discerned as food sovereignty planning. 

close up image of a hexagonal matrix of brown gels

Downloads

Published

2016-04-04

How to Cite

Lavallée-Picard, V. (2016). Planning for food sovereignty in Canada? A comparative case study of two rural communities. Canadian Food Studies La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation, 3(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.73

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016): Data, discourse, and divergence

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l'alimentation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Work published in CFS/RCÉA prior to and including Vol. 8, No. 3 (2021) is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY license. Work published in Vol. 8, No. 4 (2021) and after is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-SA license. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See more on Open Access.)