Industrial meat in Canada, growth promoters and the struggle over international food standards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i1.632Keywords:
Meat production, growth promoters, drugs, international trade, standards, Codex AlimentariusAbstract
This article focuses on differing national regulations and standards regarding how meat for human consumption is produced and what is permissible in that production process. Attempts to harmonize these regulations at the global level to facilitate international trade have proven to be challenging. Such harmonization of regulations is especially important to countries exporting meat, such as Canada. The conflict at the global level reflects a range of differing trade interests and values about what meat is and how it should be produced. One area of disagreement is over the extent to which methods of growth promotion in animals using technology, particularly drugs, is acceptable and safe in terms of human consumption. Canada has taken the position that they are acceptable and safe. Using two case studies of regulations related to the most recent set of beta agonist drugs, ractopamine and zilpatrol, fed to livestock to promote growth, I examine the underlying sources of these conflicts and the extent to which they reflect the interests of various actors and the forms of power they may employ to try to shape global standards at the Codex Alimentarius and the view of what is acceptable meat.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elizabeth Ann Smythe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Work published in CFS/RCÉA prior to and including Vol. 8, No. 3 (2021) is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY license. Work published in Vol. 8, No. 4 (2021) and after is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-SA license. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See more on Open Access.)