A review of food asset maps in Canada

Authors

  • Belinda Li Simon Fraser University
  • Tammara Soma Simon Fraser University
  • Raghava Payment Simon Fraser University
  • Srishti Kumar Simon Fraser University
  • Nicole Anderson Simon Fraser University
  • Flora Xu Simon Fraser University
  • Phonpoom Piensatienkul Simon Fraser University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i2.655

Keywords:

food asset mapping, local food systems, food security, Canada, food system planning

Abstract

Food asset mapping is gaining prominence in Canada as an important planning tool for the evaluation of local food systems. In addition to being used by planners to identify opportunities for improved food security, food asset maps are also valuable references for sourcing food locally, particularly by people experiencing food insecurity. Seventy-three food asset maps were reviewed and categorized based on the types of food assets included as well as design characteristics. Built environment assets such as grocery stores and food banks were included in most maps, as were agriculture-based natural food assets like farms, community gardens, and orchards. However, representations of Indigenous-focussed food assets and natural food assets that are not agriculture-based, such as forests, water bodies, and foraging areas, were generally lacking. The lack of representation of Indigenous perspectives on what is considered a food asset reinforces the values of a settler-colonial food system in food asset maps. The methods for food asset mapping therefore need to be changed from current quantitative practices that largely rely on secondary data sources led by governments and non-profit organizations to collaborative approaches that centre the perspectives of Indigenous peoples and other equity deserving groups.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Li, B., Soma, T., Payment, R., Kumar, S., Anderson, N., Xu, F., & Piensatienkul, P. (2024). A review of food asset maps in Canada. Canadian Food Studies La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation, 11(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i2.655