Colonial approaches in Canadian national food policy development

Carving out space for Indigenous partnership

Authors

  • Mary Coulas Carleton University
  • Gabriel Maracle Carleton University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i3.700

Keywords:

Canadian food policy, discursive institutionalism, Indigenous food, Truth and Reconciliation, national food policy, policy considerations

Abstract

The Government of Canada has claimed that the relationship with Indigenous peoples, that of First Nations, Inuit and Métis people, is their most important relationship. The rhetoric around reconciliation and Indigenous-Crown relationships are a major directive within federal policy. Using the theoretical framework of discursive institutionalism, this journal article looks at how this approach has, or has not, shaped the development of a national food policy. Discursive institutionalism is critical to understanding the complex relationships and perspectives that are embedded within the development of national food policies. Looking at the reports, discourse, and actions of the federal government, this article highlights how Indigenous people continue to be seen as stakeholders, as opposed to partners in nation-to-nation relationships. This paper analyzing the government’s approach to food policy stresses that the government recognizes the importance of having a national food policy, as well as acknowledging that Indigenous people need to be a part of the process. Indigenous peoples are distinct peoples with inherent rights that must been recognized and supported by the Crown, and that understanding needs to be a part of all policies and laws that can impact Indigenous peoples and communities.

Author Biographies

Mary Coulas, Carleton University

Mary Coulas: a white, middle-class, cisgender, and neurodivergent individual, holds privilege as a member of Canada’s dominant social group (white, English-speaking settler). Their upbringing in rural Ontario, academic success, and professional roles as an elected official and policy analyst inform their understanding of the need for deeper, critical engagement with Canada’s agricultural and agri-food systems. In this research, their privilege extends to designing the project, collecting data for their dissertation, and shaping its interpretation. Initially written from a normative perspective, the paper was reconsidered due to concerns that it perpetuated the exploitative practices it critiqued. Committed to reconciliation and equitable collaboration, the first author partnered with the second author to rewrite the work, prioritizing meaningful partnerships with Indigenous Peoples.

Gabriel Maracle, Carleton University

Gabriel Maracle is a member of Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory. His mother’s side of the family is non-Indigenous from Ontario. He was born and raised in the unceded Algonquin territory now known as Ottawa. He is a professor of Indigenous Governance in the Department of Political Science at Carleton University. He has a background in urban Indigenous policy analysis.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Coulas, M., & Maracle, G. (2024). Colonial approaches in Canadian national food policy development : Carving out space for Indigenous partnership. Canadian Food Studies La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation, 11(3), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i3.700